Technology & Security Audit
Most technology and security assessments are checklist exercises — a document nobody reads twice, a remediation list with no priorities, findings that don't map to what your insurer or examiner asks next quarter. Our assessments cover both the technology estate and the security control environment, mapped to NIST CSF 2.0, CIS Controls v8, ISO 27001, and sector-specific frameworks, with risk-ranked findings tied to dollars and time and an evidence pack your cyber insurer will actually accept.
Coverage
One audit that answers every audience's question at once.
We assess both the technology estate and the security control environment — then package the findings so your board, your examiner, your insurer, and your internal team all get what they need from a single engagement.
- IT infrastructure & architecture review
- System configuration assessment
- Vendor & supply chain posture
- Operational systems maturity
- Security controls (NIST CSF / CIS / ISO)
- Identity & access management
- Incident response readiness
- Third-party risk exposure
Deliverables
Risk Assessment Report
For IT & security teams
Framework Evidence Pack
For examiners & insurers
Board Presentation
For board & committees
Remediation Roadmap
Sequenced & budgeted
One engagement. Output that holds up in front of your board, your examiner, your insurer, and your internal team — simultaneously.
Overview
Independent assessment that holds up in front of your board, your auditors, and your insurers.
The Pressure
Your security posture now has to satisfy several demanding audiences at once, each asking harder questions every cycle.
- Carrier questionnaires — cyber-insurance renewals require structured attestations the carrier will spot-check.
- Deepening examinations — FFIEC, NYDFS, OCR, NERC, and TSA raise the bar each cycle.
- Board expectations — quarterly cyber-risk reporting that ties technical posture to business outcome.
- Professionalized threat actors — ransomware-as-a-service operators and state-aligned crews exploit the exact control gaps the public frameworks now name explicitly.
- Overlapping deadlines — examination, renewal, and board cycles rarely line up, multiplying the evidence burden.
The Gap
Most assessments are checklist exercises that produce a document nobody reads twice.
- No priorities — a flat remediation list with no risk ranking or sequencing.
- Off-target findings — results that don't map to what your insurer or examiner will ask next quarter.
- Scope over outcome — big-four audit teams deliver to the contract, satisfying it without meeting the underlying need.
- Single-framework boutiques lack the depth to make findings defensible across an FFIEC exam, an OCR audit, and a cyber-insurance renewal at once.
- Generic GRC tooling produces output that passes the tool's questionnaire but fails the examiner's actual question.
How We Help
We assess against the framework you actually live under and deliver findings that hold up in front of every audience.
- Multi-framework mapping — NIST CSF 2.0, CIS Controls v8, ISO 27001, CMMC, and sector-specific (HIPAA Security Rule, FFIEC, NYDFS, NERC CIP, PCI 4.0).
- Risk-ranked findings with specific remediation steps tied to dollars and time.
- Carrier-ready evidence pack your underwriter will actually accept.
- Reusable output — the same evidence supports the renewal, the regulator examination, the board risk-committee briefing, and the OCG audit if you serve law-firm clients.
- Integrated remediation with our GRC, Third-Party Risk Management, Applied AI, and Incident Response practices and managed services to close the gaps surfaced.
Findings senior practitioners can defend live in front of your board, auditors, examiner, and underwriter — one assessment that satisfies them all.
Capabilities
What we deliver
Documentation Review
Policies, procedures, prior assessments, audit findings — synthesis into a single picture.
Stakeholder Interviews
Technical and business interviews to understand the operational reality behind the controls.
Technical Assessment
Configuration review, architecture analysis, sample-based control testing.
Maturity Scoring
Per-control maturity ratings with peer benchmarking where data is available.
Remediation Roadmap
Sequenced, budgeted recommendations — prioritized by risk and effort.
Board Presentation
Executive-ready summary deck and live presentation to the board, audit committee, or risk committee.
Find what you don't know you don't know
Independent, vendor-neutral assessment. Quoted in days, delivered in weeks.